Just What is Corporate Social Responsibility?

Exercising Self-InterestMore charitable donations--1 percent
It's gotten mighty hard to nail down just exactlyDon't know--9 percent
what people mean these days when they speak ofWhat contributions do consumers expect from
corporate social responsibility.companies? Again, the truncated list included:
Does it mean extracting sea turtles out of fishingNon-financial contributions--29 percent
nets or not eating monoculture salmon? Does it meanNo expectations--13 percent
not out-sourcing jobs to cheaper foreign lands evenTreating employees well--11 percent
if it raises the standard of living in those places?Fixing problems created by company--11 percent
What if the outsourced jobs go to foreign unionDoing a good job--11 percent
members? Is it better to build a new LEED certifiedEnvironmentally-friendly practices--10 percent
building or to make due with the old building that'sFinancial contributions--10 percent
sturdy if not entirely energy efficient? Is it moreWhat to make of these low numbers when it comes
socially responsible for a company to donate to anto corporate charitable donations? The authors of
AIDS orphan cause in Africa than to a ballet companythe study's executive summary surmise that:
in Africa? What if the ballet company employs AIDS"...the consistent findings across both the 2006 and
victims?2007 CSR surveys, when it comes to defining the
I'm not an ethicist and some of these questions aremeaning and expectations surrounding CSR, suggest
ethical questions. But for the rest of us how are wethat companies' charitable and philanthropic giving is
supposed to navigate the thicket of sometimesno longer enough to impress consumers. Perhaps it is
competing and oftentimes perplexing conundrumsnow viewed as a standard expectation that
framed as issues of corporate social responsibility?consumers have -- a bare minimum requirement -- to
This was all so much easier when "the business ofeven be considered as a socially responsible
America [was still] business," to paraphrase thecompany."
famously-taciturn former U.S. President CalvinThey're suggesting that there's a kind of market
Coolidge.price for corporate social responsibility and that
I am, however, a marketer. And in marketing oneconsumers have already factored into that price
way to know where you stand with stakeholderscorporate generosity to charity.
who are important to you is to ask them. It won'tAccording to the Fleishman-Hillard study, what is likely
necessarily yield perfect moral clarity, but it canto move the needle for consumers when it comes to
suggest pathways.corporate social responsibility? As it turns out, it's self
Fleishman-Hillard, a public relations firm and division ofinterest.
Omnicom, in conjunction with the National ConsumersWhen asked what is most important to consumers
League has now conducted three studies on thewith regard to corporate social responsibility the top
subject of corporate social responsibility; in 2005,vote getter with 29 percent was 'treats/pays
2006 and 2007.employee well.' If England is a nation of shopkeepers
I read the executive summary for the 2007 studythen the U.S. is a nation of employees. And the
and if you can get past the laughably inaccuratesurvey's respondees are internalizing the question and
renderings of the bar charts and the occasionalanswering it as employees.
editorializing in the summary... which has been no smallAnd yet, unemployment is 4.5 percent right now in
hurdle for me... there may be something here forthe United States... quite low... which has driven real
cause marketers.wages up. So while the newspaper headlines here are
What does "corporate social responsibility" mean?filled with stories of jobs being exported to India and
Fleishman-Hillard asked consumers just that as anChina, the fact is that the American worker is in
open-ended, unprompted question. A truncated list ofpretty good shape overall; the glass is half-full. But
responses from the 2007 survey released in Maythe perception is that the American worker is
included the following:endangered... that the glass is half-empty. The
Commitment to communities--23 percentFleishman-Hillard study bears that out.
Commitment to employees--17 percentChanging that perception is in no small way a public
Responsibility to the environment--11 percentrelations challenge.
Provide quality products--10 percent