ICF vs SIP - A True Cost Analysis

The use of ICF construction and SIP walls is stronglymaterials for ICF are more expensive; namely the
debated in the sustainable construction industry. Bothconcrete per square foot. Also, a prefabricated
wall systems are very energy efficient and createproduct is not being delivered to the site so the labor
super insulated walls that meet LEED accreditedcost is more by the time the ICF walls are installed.
standards developed by the U.S. Green BuildingThe overall price for materials and installation of an
Council. Both products will construct such an airtightICF wall system can be gauged at about 30% higher
space that heat recovery ventilation systems arethan traditional poured walls.
needed to produce airflow. These systems must beIn comparison, an ICF wall needs to be thicker than a
carefully installed to eliminate thermal breaks in theSIP wall in order to achieve equal R-value. Thicker
super insulated space. Traditional stick framing canwalls mean more material that also contributes to a
claim up to R-20 walls. This, however, only considershigher cost compared to SIP construction.
the highest rated component in the wall, theLocal Availability
insulation. Other lumber and utility members in the wallLocal availability can contribute in variance of price,
contribute to thermal bridging which is a main factorand level of green construction. Not all contractors
in heat gain and loss. Both ICF and SIP wall sectionsbuild with SIPs or ICFs, but as this construction, and
contain solid insulation material that will effectivelyproduction becomes more popular the price for both
eliminate conduction and convection in the building. Inwill come down. Contractors and manufacturers are
addition to energy efficiency, one of the greatestmost abundant in the Midwest and Southwest of the
benefits that both systems share is the ability toUnited States, making these regions cheapest to build
construct quickly and accurately.using SIPs and ICFs. Investigate which contractor and
It is evident that both of these wall systems providemanufacturer (SIP or ICF) is more local; this makes
sustainable construction, but when it comes time tothe project more sustainable and will most likely offer
build, which one should you use? As most buildinglower prices. However, beware of inexperienced
decisions eventually do, it all comes down to cost.contractors because it is a new building practice. In
When analyzing the cost of these wall systems, it isaccordance, more experienced contractors typically
important to understand the price varies according tocan charge less.
each design, availability, and installation. This topic isReturn
debated by company representatives all over theSustainable building is encouraged by the return
internet. I am not a salesman for SIPs or ICFs, soinvestment. An airtight, superinsulated home created
consider this a fair analysis.by either of these wall systems allows for lower
Cost per Square Foot?operational costs due to monthly utility bills. In
It is very difficult to provide an estimation of costaddition, the HVAC equipment required to heat and
based on square footage. Many factors are involvedcool this superinsulated house does not have to be
that can only be accounted for in the exactas powerful, saving you hundreds or even thousands
specifications of the architect's plans. A general costof dollars on initial HVAC costs. While these savings
for square foot of gross wall area may be compellingare equal between the two systems, other returns
as a feasibility estimate in theory, but more factorsare not. Homeowner insurance savings are between
must be involved according to design to make an15-25% for ICF construction due to fire protection
appropriate estimate. One can research and find aratings and disaster resistance. However, no serious
wide range of cost estimates by vendors andgains in equity are made for when it comes time to
builders. The average of these values should not besell. At this time, tax benefits do not exist for building
considered to estimate cost since they are fromLEED projects, but it is hopeful that in the future
people trying to sell you a product. Instead, I havethey will. If considering a LEED scorecard in your
analyzed the trends of these values to find that thedecision, SIPs will score higher because it is a pre-built
difference of these prices suggest that SIPpanel assembly.
construction costs 5-10% less than ICF constructionConclusion
per square foot.SIP construction is generally considered less
Designexpensive when deciding which sustainable building
Window and door placement and shape must beenvelope to use. However, each project varies in
accounted for when the fabricators make cuts inprice of each according to design specifications.
panels or forms. Waste is produced in this processDesign can be optimized to standard dimensions of
while labor is involved driving the cost up. In someeach wall system to encourage lower costs.
cases, the cost can be optimized in the design of theWhichever product is manufactured closer to the site
home by strategically dimensioning the home includingis more sustainable and will cost less in comparison to
window sizes and wall lengths according toeach average cost. Considering this the cost
dimensions suggested by multiples of panel or formdifference between the two may increase or
sizes.decrease. ICFs may cost more but they generally
Many manufacturers consider structural live and deadoffer more return in terms of insurance deductions.
load analysis of the design when estimating cost. ThisOverall, it is important to investigate all of these
analysis of the plans will more accurately explain whataspects when deciding which will be less expensive.
thickness is needed where, and how much. The