A Sustainable Alternative - Conventional vs Straw Bale Construction

Embodied energy is the energy required to extract,buildings. The straw bales are laid on a bed of stone
transport, process, install, and dispose of, or recycleso they will not retain moisture. A cement screed is
the materials that make up the building.cast in the bottom of the trenches on the conc.
For this study, the total embodied energy was notfooting to be sure that any water that might find its
used to compare the two construction types, onlyway into the trench would be directed away through
the energy for the material manufacture was used,the weep holes on the sides. These are the only
because energies used to transport, install etc. wouldbricks used in the strawbale dwelling, thus embodied
in most instances be the same for both constructionenergy values for mortar and bricks are a lot less for
types and cancel each other out, and because almostthis type of construction. The foundations for
70% of the total energy invested in a building'sstrawbale buildings are shallower (200mm deep), thus
construction (Embodied energy) is embodied in theless conc. Is used as well.
materials themselves, one can compile a ratherThe last main difference is, of course, the wall
accurate comparison with using just the energy usedmaterial which differs hugely in the amount of
for the material manufacture alone, however, whenembodied energy to produce & install them.
referred to the energy used to manufacture theEmbodied energy for straw bales is 31MJ/m3
materials I will refer to the "Embodied energy".compared to the 5200MJ/m3 of stock bricks, thus
Materials which will be more or less the same inbecause the walls have the greatest material volume
quantity / volume eg. ceiling boards, cornices,of all the building components, it is understandable
skirtings, floor slab & finishes, because of thethat the strawbale dwelling will have a much lower
same floor area, have been omitted for they willtotal embodied energy value than it's rival as is
have no impact on the embodied energy outcome.indicated below.
ConstructionConclusion
To compare the two types of construction, I startedStraw is a viable building alternative, plentiful and
with a 12000mm x 6000mm brick building and includedinexpensive. Straw-bale buildings boast super-insulated
2 bedrooms, a bathroom, open plan kitchen &walls simple construction, low costs, and the
living and a garage. To justify the comparison, Iconversion of an agricultural byproduct into a valued
designed the strawbale dwelling with the same roomsbuilding material. Properly constructed and maintained,
and exactly the same floor area for each room, butthe straw-bale walls, plaster exterior and interior
because of the bales' rather wide (approx. 480mm)remain water proof, fire resistant, and pest free.
module width I ended up with a 13200mm x 7250mmBecause only limited skill is required, a community
external envelope for the straw bale dwelling. Thishouse-raising effort can build most of a straw-bale
made quite a difference on the material volume ofhouse in a single day. This effort yields a low-cost,
the roof and roof trusses. Both the dwellings'elegant, and energy-efficient living space for the
received one plaster coat, but vary in thickness.owners, a graceful addition to the community, and a
Conventional brick wall plaster width vary from apprx.desirable boost to local farm income. I think, especially
12mm - 18mm, compared to the 30mm plaster coatin this country, residential straw bale buildings could be
for strawbale walls because of the greater surfacea very sustainable viable alternative to residential
un-evenness among other reasons.architecture.
The foundation details differs from conventional brick